Sunday, September 27, 2009

Random Thoughts--TCU and Beyond

Harper's play this season has been disappointing. Clearly, there was a huge drop off when Spiller came out with Harper spelling him. Would we not be better rotating Spiller and Ellington until Harper learns to run without tip-toe'ing into the hole? Harper was supposed to be the big, powerful back who also had some speed to go with the power. We have seen none of this so far. After wasting a redshirt last year by fumbling in the Bammer game, Harper has not lived up to the hype coming out of high school. Ellington has been more effective so far. With Harper half ass running, I would much rather roll the dice with a smaller running back even in short yardage scenarios.

The Chinese fire drill at the end of the football game was ridiculous and unacceptable. Even without a timeout, Clemson should have been able to get a first down (it was 3rd and 1 with about 30 sec to go) to stop the clock and reset the offense. Instead, the Tigers waste a bunch of time, botch a fucking snap, then waste another ton of time. It is 3rd and freaking 1 at the end of the game people. Line up, run the qb sneak, get the first down, regroup. Clemson wasted at least 2 more shots at the endzone by screwing around late

It is pretty evident that there are some major issues with Clemson finishing off drives, and I don't think that there are any answers yet. Good football teams get 7 almost every time they move the ball into the redzone. That being said, I thought the way Swinney handled the game late was less than impressive. IMO, Swinney should not have called the first timeout to "think about" what to do. I would have kicked the damn field goal, reduced the TCU lead to 2 and played defense. Let's face it, there is no real reason to think that Clemson can score with the ball inside the 20...kick, play defense, use timeouts, and try to win with a late field goal--side note, had Jackson nailed the medium ranged field goal earlier, there would be no decision to be made.

Clemson has a big problem with its redzone offense...2 TD's in 12 or 13 tries is unacceptable and will lose you football games. This has to be fixed. PERIOD.

The line appeared to play pretty well today. Credit is given when it is due. Hopefully Walker at the RT spot will be a solution once Hairston is healthy again. I will attribute this improvement to Pearman's influence, as Fat Brad hasn't really done much with the line since he has been here and he doesn't coach the tackles anymore.

I think the honeymoon for the Dabo/Napier playcalling duo is about to come to a close. I am also confused by the jumbling of formations and disconnect with the flow in playcalling. Clemson runs consistently in the "I" for a few plays, then inexplicably moves to a 5-wide set. While some coaches (Ralph F. in his GT offensive coordinator comes immediately to mind) use multiple formations to run a few core plays to exploit matchup issues, I do not think this is the case. Often, it seems as though the coaches are hell-bent on running a few plays and will insert them just to run them. This continuity and the offensive flow will be something to pay attention to over the next few weeks.

Clemson has to incorporate more than Spiller and Ford into the offense. It is pathetic that we do not have a wide receiver who can fun a half decent route, nor one who can go up and get the football. Besides Ford or Spiller, it does not appear as though Parker is extremely confident with other receivers. CU will need other threats to keep defenses honest and allow Parker more targets down field.

Kyle Parker appears less and less comfortable. He looks like he is throwing off of his back foot a good bit and has to deliver the football before he (or the receiver) is ready. On item that I would like to see more out of KP is making positive yardage with his feet. There have been several occurrences in which Parker has moved out of the pocket with open space in front of him. Parker often tries to do a little much (see interception against GT, where he under threw across his body a wide-open Ford instead of tucking the ball, getting the 3rd down conversion, and moving the offense down the field). Once again, KP is a freshman and will only get better with experience. I expect him to improve greatly between TCU and the end of the season.

The defense overall played well enough to win. There was the fluke pass during the 1st quarter (these things are almost a stroke of luck, and they happen...not too much to bitch about other than just bad luck). Clemson had a good bit of trouble with the qb inside. This is a basic play run by a lot of teams with agile quarterback play. Georgia Tech killed us with a similar play. Defensively, we have a few issues with coverages, but are in a pretty good situation entering into the heart of conference play.

Special teams were pretty bland (compared to previous weeks) with the Tigers missing a very routine 35 (or so) yard field goal in the fourth qtr (this is big because Clemson's red zone offense isn't worth a shit, and we need all the points we can get--it also would have made it a 2 pt game, allowing the Tigers to kick a game-winning field goal later). I really cannot complain too much about the kicking game, other than say that these kicks must be chip-shots. Overall this season, I have been impressed with R. Jackson.

The trip to College Park this weekend is (hopefully) just what Clemson will need to get back on track. UMd lost to MTSU earlier in the season, and should be a relative speed-bump for the Tigers. Let's hope Clemson doesn't waste opportunities like the '08 UMd game and plays all four quarters.

8 comments:

  1. And if they dont, someone needs their balls ripped off.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Harper has been a real disappointment so far. He has served as a good stand in for Macko, and that's about it. No speed, no power, no elusiveness. Ellington looked good previously - yet he does not get a single carry in this game? What gives? Sick, in the doghouse, being punished for fumbling?

    It seems none of the WRs can get open very much - I don't know if that is bad play design or just bad execution. Seriously, is Ashe still the best guy?

    The offense just seems generally out of sync. Haphazard, hit or miss. In this game we seemed to be facing many many 2nd and 10s which became 3rd and 7+.

    I don't recall many deep balls to Ford. Seriously, can he be covered that well all game? Who the heck can keep up with him? It shouldn't take too long for him to get deep- he is the fastest receiver in the game, or darn close to it.

    I am really having quesy feelings Napier as an OC, and I am wondering about Scott as a WR coach. Maybe they will work out. I don't think you can write them off yet, but there comes a time...Spence seemed OK for a while, but eventually our opponents had him figured out.

    On the flipside, Swinney went out and got some guys who seem to know what they are doing on defense. (Other than stopping QB runs up the middle for 12+ yards.)

    Parker has stated he is not a big fan of running option plays. I imagine Korn would jump at the chance to play even if it meant taking hits. Otherwise it looks like he will be a cheerleader for 2 more years. Perhaps a threat of QB runs might give us another dimension?

    Right now, it is either pray for a hole for Spiller, or pray that one of our receivers gets open.

    -Z

    ReplyDelete
  3. The playcalling is questionable. With the shitty play at WR, most folks wonder what is wrong. The problem is piss poor route running. We do not run crisp routes. this, coupled with our problems up front, lead to inconsistency in the passing game.

    This is a receiving problem. This is a Jeff Scott problem. You are absolutely correct about the staff. The experienced defensive side is on top of shit. Offensively, Pearman has the tackles actually playing OK (Big improvement). The big question is Napier (has never called plays before) and Jeff Scott (a grad assistant last year).

    I am not concerned with Parker, other than the fact that he is gaining all of his experience NOW. I would like to see Will Korn at some point to see if he can move out of the pocket and run. So far, Korn has had no success this season. I think every Clemson fan wants Will Korn to play just because he has been committed to this program for many years.

    Clemson has to find another source of offense other than Ford or Spiller. If you throw the ball deep to Ford, you at least gain the respect of a safety, hopefully opening up underneath routes for other guys.

    Swinney has gotten his last "moral victory". I really think he wants to win, so if we see this much BS for the rest of the year, I believe he will dig in the "Stallings" well and get us folks that can get it done...even if he has to bring Gene out to do it himself.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The previous comments echo my sentiments pretty much....Dabo has some weak links in his staff and has some things to learn about game management himself...The question is will he make the necessary adjustments or not? The bigger issue as far as I'm concerned is the university's commitment to the athletic program overall....It seems to me the powers that be are only too happy to lose 5 games a year, go to a shitty bowl and lose it to some team we should beat, and then try and ply us all into coming back saying "this is the year".....I think they could care less....Honestly, if our university really cared about wins and losses, would they have gambled on a WR coach as the top dog? I think they could've gotten Gary Patterson for not too much more money....I was raised on Ford...I got used to winning 20 years ago....I don't like losing....But the "clemson nation" seems all too accepting of it....To me, anything more than 3 losses a year is unacceptable...And this team will lose at least 5 this year, maybe more....

    ReplyDelete
  5. If we dont improve quick, it'll be 5 for sure.

    And if we're gonna put it on Jeff, it has to be on Dabo too. He should've tought Ashe to run better routes and catch passes that HIT HIS FUCKING HANDS.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I can only add poor blocking by the receiving core along with their other problems. That analysis along with the comments pretty much sums up the offense. The good thing is that all of it is fixable; the bad is that in those two key spots you have the weakest links of your coaching staff at the helm (Jeff Scott and Billy Napier). Napier at least has done some things that you could point to as a sign of hope. The receivers on the other hand need help badly. The only thing that that points toward sucess is that they have faced probably the best coached teams on the schedule, but they really have to get on the ball now.

    Yeah the line did have a better game against the best front four they have faced. If Walker really gets on track and Hairston returns they can really take off. The offensive staff need to understand that they are holding the team back, and it's been that way for a while now...

    ReplyDelete
  7. I agree with the concept about Jeff Scott. All of this poor receiver play started with Swinney at WR coach. Why we cannot run crisp, non-rounded-off routes is beside me. Dropped passes are killing this offense and I have seen little improvement in this area.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I think if we lose to MD, I'm totally "all out"

    They are terrible.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.